Who's best interest?

Who's best interest?
IN THE DARKNESS OF SECRECY, ALL SORTS OF THINGS GO WRONG...IF WE LOSE OUR CHILDREN...WE LOSE OUR NATION!!

The family is the basic unit of social structure. Families define and shape the individuals that are a part of the family unit. Parents teach their children their values, and teach them a moral value of what is right and what is wrong. Parents set boundaries as to what is acceptable behavior and what will not be tolerated. These are basic and fundamental rights given to parents. They are recognized by the highest court in America to be the responsibility of the parents, not the job of the government. - Dawn Michelle Irons, BSW

Nancy,Your message will continue here, but your journey is not through. You will be sorely missed..

Nancy,Your message will continue here, but your journey is not through. You will be sorely missed..
Senator Nancy Schaefer was a spokesperson for Family Values and an advocate for families & children . She had taken on our corrupt judicial system, government agencies like Child Protection services. She is gone now & we seek the truth..Click on pic and read CPS Corruption. Keep her voice alive!!

Georgia Senator Nancy Schafer

A GAG ORDER SENT FROM THE TOP, UNFORTUNATELY WORKED ALL THE WAY TO HER GRAVE.

One of our Biggest Children and Family Advocates is Murdered.....

Was she too close to exposing the Truth???
Check out the video below!!

About Me

My photo
Educated and loving mother who is proud of her children and would like to see justice and constitutional conduct in our court rooms, but more importantly, the word Family needs to become something that is respected by all and protected by our constitution. It really does start with the parents. For more of "My" Story, see my blog and look for my picture and post called "My story to the Board of Supervisors".

We are expendable!!

OVERRULED: GOVT INVASION OF YOUR PARENTAL RIGHTS

scratch and search


One public Hearing at a Time!!

Friday, December 10, 2010

HOORAY FOR NO MORE HEARSAY...NEW SUPREME COURT RULING

Connecticut DCF Watch
The government’s interest in the welfare of children embraces not only protecting children from physical abuse, but also protecting children’s interest in the privacy and dignity of their homes and in the lawfully exercised authority of their parents.”
Calabretta v. Floyd, 189 F.3d 808 (9th Cir. 1999).
 
 
 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE TO ALL SUPERIOR AND JUVENILE JUDGES

SUPREME COURT RULES 9-0
ON MARCH 8, 2004, SUPREME COURT RULES THAT HEARSAY EVIDENCE IN CHILD ABUSE/NEGLECT AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES IS NOT ADMISSIBLE. PARENTS HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO CONFRONT THEIR ACCUSER UNDER THE 6TH AMENDMENT. DCF, THE AAG AND THE STATES ATTORNEY MUST NOW COMPLY WITH THE 6TH AMENDMENT IN CHILD ABUSE/NEGLECT AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES.

Ruling on hearsay evidence guts cases
Prosecuting abuse and domestic violence will be harder after the Supreme Court's affirmation of the right to face an accuser03/11/04
ROBIN FRANZEN
One of the most defense-friendly U.S. Supreme Court decisions in years, underscoring the right to cross-examine witnesses, could severely thwart the ability of prosecutors to try certain sensitive cases of domestic abuse and child abuse.
Legal authorities were scrambling to decide the extent of Monday's ruling but said Wednesday that it could gut prosecution of cases in which victims often refuse to testify at trial -- domestic violence being a prime example -- and limit the use of co-defendants' statements in the prosecution of other cases.
The 9-0 opinion potentially disallows hearsay evidence that courts had increasingly allowed as exceptions during the past 25 years and boldly reinforces a defendant's right to confront witnesses under the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
"This decision will have a significant impact on criminal prosecution, no doubt," said Kevin Neely, spokesman for the Oregon attorney general's office, which convened a meeting Wednesday to discuss the ruling's effect.
Dana Forman, a criminal defense lawyer, considers the decision in Crawford v. Washington to be the most important ruling from the Supreme Court since the 1966 Miranda decision in terms of preserving constitutional rights for criminal defendants.
"I was blown away by the scope of the thing," she said.
The decision overturned an assault conviction against Michael Crawford of Olympia, who stabbed a man he thought had tried to rape his wife. Crawford claimed self-defense, arguing the victim was going for a weapon when he was stabbed.
His wife, Sylvia, who was present at the time of the incident, did not testify at her husband's trial, invoking marital privilege. However, a judge said the prosecution could use her taped statement to police indicating that there was no weapon.
The Supreme Court ruled that the wife's statement to police was not admissible because the defense did not have an opportunity to cross-examine her.
In overturning the Washington Supreme Court on the Crawford case, the U.S. Supreme Court also abandoned its own 1980 ruling, Ohio v. Roberts, that allowed a hearsay witness statement if a judge found it trustworthy.
Inadequate under Sixth Amendment
Justice Antonin Scalia, who wrote Monday's opinion, said that wouldn't have been enough for the framers of the Constitution.
"Dispensing with confrontation because testimony is obviously reliable is akin to dispensing with jury trial because a defendant is obviously guilty," Scalia wrote. "This is not what the Sixth Amendment prescribes."
Previously, Oregon prosecutors handling domestic violence and child abuse cases did not have an absolute obligation to produce a witness at trial, Neely said. Instead, they could rely on statements those witnesses made to police officers if they were found to be reliable. Typically, in domestic violence cases, those statements had to be made within 24 hours of the incident.
"Now, in those instances, (prosecutors) will not be able to rely on the officer," he said. "They'll be required to produce a witness."
It was unclear Wednesday whether the Supreme Court's ruling would be retroactive. Prosecutors certainly hope not. But they are concerned.
"We had a situation where the law was pretty settled that this was admissible," said Norm Frink, chief deputy district attorney for Multnomah County. "Now, I'm sure every sex abuser in the penitentiary is probably thinking they are going to get out."
Oregon case already affected
Already, the Supreme Court ruling has caused an Oregon criminal case to be dismissed.
When a domestic assault trial began Monday morning without the victim's cooperation, a Multnomah County judge ruled that hearsay statements against the defendant were admissible. But that afternoon, after the high court's ruling, Forman, who works for Multnomah Defenders Inc., successfully asked the judge to exclude the statement. The case was dismissed.
The only way it can be reinstated, Forman said, is if the district attorney compels the victim to testify by issuing an arrest warrant.
Although John Bradley, special counsel for the Multnomah County district attorney's office, agreed the decision will make prosecutors' jobs harder, he cautioned that it might not be as broad as it appears on first reading.
Bradley said the opinion doesn't affect many types of evidence typically admitted at trial, including medical reports or business records. He also said he expected it would take years of litigation to sort out exactly what type of evidence falls under Monday's ruling.
Defense lawyer Larry Matasar said he thought the ruling would, perhaps most importantly, prevent innocent people from being convicted.
"If you believe in the judicial system and the right of confrontation, it's one of the bedrock principles," he said.
Although the ruling was unanimous, Chief Justice William Rehnquist dissented from overturning the court's 1980 decision that allowed some hearsay evidence. He said it was crucial to deal with the unresolved questions raised by the new ruling quickly.
"Thousands of federal prosecutors and the tens of thousands of state prosecutors need answers," he wrote. "They need them now, not months or years from now. . . . The parties should not be left in the dark in this manner."
News researcher Kathleen Blythe contributed to this report.
Reporter Robin Franzen: 503-221-8133; robinfranzen@news.oregonian.com
Copyright 2004 Oregon Live. All Rights Reserved.

No comments:

My girls

My girls
What it's all about

MAKING A DIFFERENCE..AS ONE LIFE INTERSECTS ANOTHER


A SPECIAL THANKS...

to a select few, who have taken me under their wing, treated me as family and most importantly, NEVER abandon me, nor judged me, NO MATTER WHAT.

MY ATTORNEY.. JIM BRUNELLO.

If you ever read this, You must know...You saved my life, taught me through your experiences and never forgot to remind me of my talents and the lives I have touched. When I feel down, I think of what you always told me..."You're ok Kid".

FROM THE BOTTOM OF MY HEART, THANK YOU


MY PARTNER IN CRIME...PENNY ARNOLD (AKA) TRIPPLE "C".

We were two moms waiting to be seen at the court house that lonely morning. Fate brought us together, and together we stood through fear, disbelief, pain and sorrow. I will always cherish our nights of wine, crying, studying case law, but more importantly, when I stood alone and faced Pure Evil, I was not alone, as you were always there, when I turned around.

THAT FEELING IS PRICELESS

I LOVE YOU FRIEND



ROBERT SAUNDERS.
(Never judge a book by its Cover) YOU ARE AWESOME!!
YOU GAVE US HOPE, AND THE DRIVE WE NEEDED TO FIGHT
WHEN OUR MOMENTUM ALMOST CAME TO A STAND STILL


FATHERS FOR JUSTICE and JUSTICE REFORM COALITION.

MY BEAUTIFUL DAUGHTER..CHLOE


I watch you unfold and am amazed every day, as I now learn much from you. Your calling is much bigger, as you will soon realize.

MY QUIET WARRIOR..MY LEGACY...

NEVER OF ME, BUT THROUGH ME...
THAT IS U MY DEAR.. MISS CHLOE

VOICES

*VOICES*


Can't they hear? Can't they see? This sweet, soft voice beckons for help, "Please Hear Me". One small mouth is never a match for the selective listening social worker, Indeed.
Sad eyes, stay there and don't despair, Your voice, it pierces me as it sailed through the air. This soft voice that I did hear, will now be delivered with Power, and very Clear.
Relax little one, breathe deep with no fear, your pain we will carry, your message "They" will hear.
I won't stop, I won't, as God as my witness, and now my carreer....Then off in the distance, soft voices, they wander.....It's ok little one, ...I'm coming "My Dear"

Yes We are Coming
Justice is Here!!

(This came from deep in my gut one night that I just could not sleep. I wept uncontrollably as I heard their voices in my head; I sat down to console them and gave them my promise, for which you've just read.


BOONDOCK SAINTS CREED



We do not ask for your poor or your hungry..
We do not want your tired and sick..
It is your corrupt we claim.
It is your evil that will be sought by us..
With every breath we shall hunt them down..
Each day we will spill their blood 'til it rains down from the skies