| THIS IS A MUST READ!! Not for the Faint Hearted. | 
When my girlfriend and I had joined El Dorado County Victims of CPS,
It
 was a small group originating in South Lake Tahoe, So Penny and I 
decided to concentrate a little farther south so we could spread our 
organization out, but more importantly, El Dorado County encompasses 
both Lake Tahoe and the lower half, just shy of Sacramento.  I believe 
we had a great bunch of people, and although small, each one of us, just
 diverse enough to handle about any situation.  All CPS knew of us at 
this point was regarding out demonstrations and appearances at the Board
 of Supervisors mtgs, which became heated at times. We spoke of our 
frustrations, however, we needed to get through and talk to them on a  
personal level; from one mother or father to another.  They (CPS) 
accepted our request for a meeting to discuss only a few issues that the
 parents were dealing with, so that we could relay to the parents any 
and all misunderstandings etc.We narrowed it down to one issue we felt was the determining factor that left the parents in the court room absolutely helpless.
I drafted an agenda, gave it to them ahead of time as to keep everything in order...
Remember the phrase "stop short", well, that is exactly what happened, and it was only part of their (CPS) plan to make sure that we did not have access to any inside information, or heaven forbid, help or advocate for the fucking families that were shredded to bits during the kidnapping of their kids and finally terminating their parental rights, yes, all in the name of MONEY.
Ok Ok, I will cut to the chase... the meeting was completly focused on whether we had a leader, and if so, who. This was you see, if anything went wrong, they could swiftly reprimand us, and of course to divert the attention away from the contents of the agenda. We told them that we did not have a leader and preferred to make decisions as a team. That, of course, did not sit well with the Big Cheese, Mr. Nielson, as he promptly needed a leader and a mission statement from our group, all within a week or this would be the end of the road for our group.
I have attached, first, the agenda, and then after two weeks, the Director of CPS emails one of our staff, Ernie Claudio, and basically degrades who we are and what we stand for.. With Ernies permission, I told him that I would like to respond to the CPS DIRECTOR'S LETTER, point by point. That letter is attached as well. Harsh, but it was closure that I needed and one of my better letters.
Copies were sent to county cousel, our Lovely District Attorney, Board of Supervisors.
I go back and read this one frequently..
Enjoy
Justice Now/CPS Reform meeting with  
                  CPS Management 
Notice of Meeting and its contents                                                     June 15, 2010 
 |   
To:  Janet Walker-Conroy, Daniel Nielson
           Mark Connotes
From:  Justice Now/CPS Reform, 
We
 would like to begin by thanking each one of you for taking the time out
 of your busy schedule, in order to discuss a long standing issue, not 
only with us, but many families.  We would like to stay focused on the 
issue at hand during the meeting so we have created an agenda with a 
topic that we will present to you and try to gain some understanding of 
why things are done the way they are as well as the state of the agency 
at this point in time.  There are numerous items to address; however, 
the one common theme that stands out with most families is the issue of 
documentation (court reports) and the notice of hearing (timely 
manner).   
Below,
 we have enlisted some facts and information relevant to our meeting, 
and finally a few questions that we would like some answers to, only 
because what continues to happen is in direct contrast with the policies
 set forth by CPS. 
We
 hope that providing you with our agenda allows you some comfort and 
time to think about the questions, information and your response to some
 very critical issues.  This should facilitate our meeting as we will 
work to keep a positive and productive tone throughout the meeting.    
We also have hopes that this will be the beginning of a long-standing 
and productive relationship. 
The
 one request we have is that a policy manual be available during the 
meeting so that we may refer to as well as clear up any 
miss-understandings.  
Notice
 of Hearings:   The fact is that the notice of hearing is to be in the 
hands of the parents and their attorney 10 days before the hearing.  
Most would be happy if the post mark was within 10 days, but 
unfortunately, the notices, and more importantly the recommendations, 
are delivered in person to the families on the front steps of the court 
house.   The families are already nervous about court, nervous about 
what is going to happen and frustrated because they have learned that no
 one in the CPS/Juvenile system is there to act as their advocate.  
Without
 the 10 days notice, the parents are rendered defenseless in the court 
room.    What’s worse is that these reports are littered with 
inaccuracies and false statements, and when not challenged, the decision
 by the judge can be catastrophic. 
 These
 reports should contain accurate and truthful information, and when they
 don’t, the parents and their attorneys must be ready to submit 
corrections to the report, as they are not allowed to speak up in court 
nor will the court appointed attorney stand up and object to any wrong 
doings. 
We all know that undisputed testimony becomes fact, whether it is the truth or not. 
1.       What
 can you do (CPS mngmt) to ensure that the reports are in the hands of 
the families and their attorneys within the proper time frame?   On a 
side note, the notice of hearing contains a box in which a check mark is
 to be placed if the notice and recommendations are delivered within the
 proper time frame.  The fact is, this box is checked even when we 
receive the reports 10 minutes before the hearing.
2.       If
 the above cannot be remedied, what options, if any, are available to 
the family?   More than not, the family is unaware that they can call 
for a continuance due to this delay, but are never told by the social 
worker or their attorney(court appointed)
3.       Will
 you advocate for the parent regarding a continuance.  Are you aware 
that both the attorney and the social worker rarely keep the parent 
informed of what is going on?
4.       This
 is where we come in, and could act as a liaison between the attorneys, 
social workers and then would be able to explain the process to the 
parents by someone who has been in their shoes.  
This
 10 day time frame is very important, due to the fact that many reports 
are littered with inaccuracies, opinions as facts, and false statements 
or allegations.  These can range anywhere from minor to major, but the 
point is, this happens every day, and even when others are aware of 
these injustices, they remain silent  to keep the show running smoothly 
as the clock ticks it’s countdown towards parental termination. 
1.       Are there consequences for the underwriter when these mistakes are founded?
2.       If so, what are the consequences when the law is broken, and what is the consequence when the policy manual has been violated? 
3.       Is
 there documentation on file to show  these reprimands,  proving  that 
in fact that the social worker was written up, not just hearsay.  
4.       Aside
 from the multi level peer group, what other system of checks and 
balances are in place to ensure that the social workers adhere to the 
policy manual and abide by the law?  There are many sections to the 14th amendment that CPS violates daily and these are punishable by fines, imprisonment, or both.   
**
 Some thoughts on the reports;   the mistakes they contain, and why the 
social workers might write the reports with such a negative tone and 
heavy hand. **
There
 is a preconceived attitude of clients by case workers that perpetuates 
disregard and disrespect of clients (parents) that often continues 
throughout their entire program.  My personal experience will attest to 
this. During my 18 long months in the system, every report had numerous 
errors. When I asked my social worker why her report was different from 
what we had talked about, she said” Just ask your attorney”.  Not one 
person was concerned with the fact that my report was filled with lies. 
 In some instances, the reports became worse and my daughter used as 
leverage the more I questioned these injustices.  Theses social workers 
are faced with challenging ethical dilemmas daily, compounded with the 
fact that their case loads are beyond full and there is just not enough 
time in the day to complete all necessary tasks.  Could this possibly be
 a reason for such horrible reports?    Are there unreasonable demands 
placed on the social workers by management, ethical or not?  Is there a 
pay value for writing the report in such a negative manner?  Is the 
social worker licensed or not?  Blatant lie vs.  Ignorance 
Our
 hope is that by  having a day or two to familiarize yourself with this 
agenda, which should give you a little time to think about the questions
 and concerns we have.   These types of meetings have a propensity for 
becoming emotionally driven due to the nature and that is why we tried 
to keep everything   based on fact .  We also welcome  any questions, 
concerns or comments from your management, so 
you
 will be able to prepare and answer our questions either at the meeting 
or, in writing, within 14 days of the meeting. (June 29th)
The
 Board of Supervisors has been briefed on this meeting and has a copy of
 the same document you are now reading.  They will be waiting for a 
review of our meeting as well as the response to our questions, answered
 or not.  The public has been notified of the meeting and is anxiously 
awaiting the results.   Our community is becoming  frustrated with the 
operations of CPS,  however, if they see that there is positive 
communication between us,  I believe we could play a part  in changing 
the public’s perception  of CPS    and the manner in which it deals with
 the family and children.      
Every
 parent and child’s legal rights must be observed and protected by CPS. 
 Failure to consider the “Individual” may be CPS’S biggest failing. 
Our
 only goal is to open lines of communication between the agency and the 
families who are working on re-unification.  Once there is a clear 
understanding of the case plan, court proceedings, and a time frame to 
re-unify, the tension and adversarial tone begin to subside, quite 
possibly clearing the way to a successful outcome for all.
We look forward to meeting with you,
Regards, 
JUSTICE NOW/CPS REFORM
Sounds good right.?????
what a fucking letdown
11/5/2010
Mr. Nielson;
I would like to respond to your letter submitted to Ernie Claudio, on or about July 19, 2010
I
 will start by  saying, thank you, for the short lived effort and 
although you did inform us that you needed a leader and a mission 
statement before proceeding, we were quite busy due to the fact that 
this is a very busy time of the year for CPS, as we are learning, and as
 your case loads increase, magically,  our client base explodes.   Being
 that this is volunteer only, we had to make the decision on whether to 
get all of us together, sit down and chat about a leader and a mission 
statement, or  desperately help parents try and get some answers to 
things because their attorneys and social workers flat out refuse to 
keep them informed.  
I won’t be 
speaking from or through my fellow advocates;  I am speaking to you as a
 woman, a mother and one who still believes that one day that truth and 
justice will prevail.  
Yes Mr. 
Nielson, You were and are clear about who you won’t meet with, and 
unfortunately that includes families who are left in the dark, and 
recent history shows almost no representation by these so called “court 
appointed attorneys”;While these parents struggle daily to prove their 
fitness as a parent; and then, and only then,  if the social worker 
believes that the parent has benefited from the services, the children 
might come home.  That is a lot of power given to a social worker, and 
90 % of the time there is an adversarial tone between worker and 
parent.   You will never hear of this Mr. Nielson, because these social 
workers have been here longer than you and they are trained in tactics 
that use fear and intimidation, and once used on the parent, they know 
it won’t go anywhere, because the threat of losing their children makes 
them comply immediately.
It is in 
fact quite simple, if you look at it from a business standpoint;  What 
we supply as advocates, is very much in demand.  You are correct when 
you say that we are simply a small collection of individuals, who have a
 very poor understanding about CPS operations, law, etc. 
I
 will add by saying our understanding is less than poor when 
understanding the injustices that continue under your leadership and 
management.  Our primary focus has never been leadership and/or upper 
echelon management  that wears an empty title.    We are the “army 
grunts” on the front line, in the midst of battle, sacrificing life and 
liberty for our brothers in arms.  We advocate for the very thing this 
country was founded on!!
Mr. 
Nielson,  You rarely engage families with concern, and families that try
 and use the chain of command, are stopped abruptly by their social 
workers who use their tactics of leveraging the children against the 
parents.  So, while you think it is smooth running from up top,  your 
thumb has never really quite felt the pulse beat of your organization, 
even though your signature graces every clients paper work.   Mr. 
Nielson, are you aware that your supervisors and social workers are 
forcing children, 10 and under, to visit in a room, with the parent that
 brutally sexually abused them.  While the child screams and clings to 
the mother because they don’t want to go, the mother objects to this, 
and subsequently is restrained by the sheriff, the child is peeled off 
of the mother, and forced to go to the abuser.  My body shudders as I 
even write this.  2 days ago, I checked to see how the mother and family
 were doing, hoping that the visits would stop; someone must surely see 
that this is worse than hell.  The mother, with a blank stare, looking 
right through me, says”the visitations have turned into “overnights”.  
Mr. Nielson, her life will never be the same, and YOU ARE TO BLAME!!  I 
must applaud you and your staff for having the ability to go “third 
person” which has got to be the only reason you can go home and sleep at
 night.  I comforted this mother as she screamed in my arms;  My old 
ways would tell me to do something else, but I must believe in KARMA,  
and that goodness will prevail.
You 
say that any client who has problems with their report has access to 
anyone in the chain of command at any time.  Mr .Nielson, have you tried
 to call your own agency under a fake name just to check what a response
 time might be, maybe check on customer service? It might surprise you.
The
 parent never has the chance to rectify the situation, which can only be
 done very early on in the proceedings when the parents are, for the 
lack of a better word, deemed crazy and unfit, but the one who is to 
advocate simply tells the parent to sit back, be silent and accept the 
case  plan.  Once the box for reasonable efforts is checked, that 
wonderful title iv funding just flows down stream.  It is even a bonus 
if the kids clean up well, as they won’t languish in the system too 
long.   I sit back and try to imagine having the amount of  power you 
and even your social workers have, and if I had that much, I must admit,
 it would be quite hard to contain myself too!!
Yes,
 I’m not a client anymore, however, I now do what I do because I was a 
client, if that makes sense.   I am sorry to see that you believe we 
have failed to state our purpose;  Many in our county would disagree.  
You will never hear the clients concern because you and your 
organization don’t think there is a problem.  A grand jury investigation
 of your agency almost every year from 2000 to 2009 might say different.
 
You have made mention of multiple 
meetings throughout the year with ernie; the fact is that there have 
only been two, after many distractions and cancellations, and I believe 
you only attended one.  
You are 
correct again in saying that your sole purpose was to have us identify a
 group leader, and our role and/or mission statement.  You made that 
such a priority, that it conveniently created a distraction in order for
 you to dodge the one question we had for you.   You have shown once 
again consistency in dodging important matters, questions and 
accountability. BRAVO!!  My wish for you Mr. Nielson?  Attend a hearing 
or two;   visit a family who has just had their parental rights 
terminated;  comfort a mother who has her child ripped from her arms;  
COMFORT A CHILD WHO SCREAMS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT REMEMBERING THE DAY HE WAS TAKEN.  I still do!!
The
 only one who has failed, Mr. Nielson, is you;  and perhaps your biggest
 failing is not recognizing the one you are obligated to protect;    THE CHILD
No comments:
Post a Comment